ats
317
(anodrœuth
duoti prio" quê
no.tol tuo s^halvorafon od tucaor orls overt I
era ko?! of bullqon ere! don birora I
t
bres to されおさた以上
‚¿t at hentes autog s al stort tud jozechsetrið taomie al tootduc
Vinteroaß ode of noisa^{10:= "0097 Toy to slaat erit af di as oth
.rt no nvory'e Jdalt to/2w* (* tupor of or of amron ‚etat” to
ng dalit bootyпoo con ons Boy JALD YOU NOY
.9
farist 0 ole mi o show bit too ee HD TOWNS” e bonitob-llow #
#modoqnoo Vihurutores of betasolle oc ton ed-in moitoibeizut
obtw of broad at but I cone stob daonn vsov del" .onbut oncivT
vikah oft ritiv Taifi 31 vícootiog tom al odv one the worl bustɑ-
-xofqrroo bun anotspottinam yna atk dalwuon ode to malinow 21 not,rooidve ode no noluigo oriolang a cabrqze arɔ,cofol-
mvo air pont ambiltos wor! neo ascrval a doll zuodas terram a pl
Ilrow Nsmuni on aseto de Chic jelde at or aolzang deið"
+
-alairths to offatch out to den somnams-on a matteo tua o Xntre
a to Insofob odt or "0 tsw-to-nek a to nie¿gað oft ot molta"‡-
¡aumbel, siz or abam malod aya. Ia ens acolteromundove,cnamic of
ni oben med vidst“avat and doł w viqo* telfirst et al di so%
old bomu ovari volt onuda zove nooitach toirin ode of busfarkt
-ozofit butor ris I .pembit to Stara eft qafasotaal tot veİBB0000
I arob ode to conotrouxo grof a mort test woy ![Ist of stut-
bloo dot.lv teo-que mort as fore how to tnononists on to wom!
to test male maen toildo var ewar birow riot: ́w obam ad vidiaaog
guio quitund to ,naoniewd to toebitos out smitsoliqsoo xoʻid^WI da noż¿nowy od .DSKAD DAŻvat vi vefgh one of "nibbs to brus bitsfritt at GAV $1 ea enen brit viealoung at "rolol art at orast
gaftalog a to Angeoon oft headgrooot thenmovon sds orotad
of idianoq ti cl
signia vizɔotog al #1 hos,co-br% ifner"
outer bit Misty aaontend to dolžalumnos tusaora sde no VTAO
Tista
staff which existed forty years ago? A negative answer is to
be found in the fact that repeated deadlocks occur, as I have
reported from time to time.
3.
Your use of the expression "thoroughly
competent Pulane Judge" induces me to make the following re-
-marks, and to make this letter "confidential". Mr. Justice
Gompertz is as thoroughly competent a man as could be found
for Summary Jurisdiction; he is a born lawyer, and I look to
see him in the xxx future Chief Justice. Mr. Hazeland has not
his experience or knowledge; but he has a fund of legal know-
-ledge which has sumrised me; he is doing his work admirably,
and I am including some of his judgments in the Law Reports.
The Surmary Jurisdiction work has altered
considerably during the last two years; important cases are often
tried which take two or even more days to hear. I attribute this
to the advent of new members of the junior bar; Counsel are
being employed in the Summary Court more frequently than was
formerly the caso.
4.
5.
With regard to the last paragraph of your
letter, I am sorry to see that you still seen to think the
proposed new Appeal Court a possible solution of the difficulty
of the situation which has existed since I have known the Courts
of the Colony. It is hopelessly and utterly impracticable.
Quite apart from other reasons which I have explained, I must
draw your attention to what has occurred quite recently. There
have been two cases at least of the utmost importance which had
to be taken before the Full Court - one of them the bani sluzent
case,
in which there was an old decision of the Full Court
which had to be set aside. It was necessary that they should
be dealt with propatly, but promptness in hearing is the one
thing which would be impossible under the proposed scheme.
6.
↑ should be obliged if you would forward a
copy of this letter to the Secretary of State in order to
complete this additional correspondence xxx on the
subject.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.